Download Classifying spaces of sporadic groups by David J. Benson, Stephen D. Smith PDF

By David J. Benson, Stephen D. Smith

For every of the 26 sporadic finite uncomplicated teams, the authors build a 2-completed classifying house utilizing a homotopy decomposition when it comes to classifying areas of appropriate 2-local subgroups. This building ends up in an additive decomposition of the mod 2 staff cohomology. The authors additionally summarize the present prestige of data within the literature concerning the ring constitution of the mod 2 cohomology of sporadic basic teams. This booklet starts with a pretty broad preliminary exposition, meant for non-experts, of heritage fabric at the appropriate buildings from algebraic topology, and on neighborhood geometries from staff concept. the next chapters then use these buildings to enhance the most effects on person sporadic teams

Show description

Read or Download Classifying spaces of sporadic groups PDF

Similar group theory books

Metaplectic Groups and Segal Algebras

Those notes provide an account of modern paintings in harmonic research facing the analytical foundations of A. Weil's idea of metaplectic teams. it's proven that Weil's major theorem holds for a category of services (a yes Segal algebra) better than that of the Schwartz-Bruhat features thought of via Weil.

Representation of Lie Groups and Special Functions: Volume 2: Class I Representations, Special Functions, and Integral Transforms

This is often the second one of 3 significant volumes which current a finished therapy of the idea of the most periods of precise features from the viewpoint of the idea of team representations. This quantity bargains with the houses of distinctive capabilities and orthogonal polynomials (Legendre, Gegenbauer, Jacobi, Laguerre, Bessel and others) that are on the topic of the category 1 representations of varied teams.

Modules and Algebras: Bimodule Structure on Group Actions and Algebras

Module concept over commutative asociative jewelry is mostly prolonged to noncommutative associative jewelry by way of introducing the class of left (or correct) modules. an alternative choice to this technique is advised via contemplating bimodules. a sophisticated module concept for associative jewelry is used to enquire the bimodule constitution of arbitary algebras and staff activities on those algebras.

Group theory and its application to physical problems

"A remarkably intelligible survey . . . good equipped, good written and intensely transparent all through. " — Mathematical ReviewsThis first-class textual content, lengthy one in every of the best-written, such a lot skillful expositions of team idea and its actual purposes, is directed essentially to complex undergraduate and graduate scholars in physics, in particular quantum physics.

Additional resources for Classifying spaces of sporadic groups

Example text

7. Question. Cont is preserved under Mer quotients and finite Mer sums. 5, a quotient of a sum of contigual spaces has to be locally totally bounded. Must a quotient of a locally contigual space be locally contigual? 8. Counterexample. Consider the Cech-Stone compactification of~. the natural numbers. Let p e SIN - IN and let X be the Top subspace of ~N with underlying set IN v {p}. Then X, being topological, is necessarily grilldetermined, but X does not lie in CH(Cont). In fact, the CH(Cont) coreflection of X is discrete.

Theorem 1. For any regular cardinal a ;;. K 1, the a-filtered co limits corronute in IB with the a-limits ; moreover, they are preserved and reflected by the closed unit ball functor U : lE + Sets. The a-filtered colimit is computed at the level of underlying vector spaces and provided with the semi-norm II [x]ll inf II y\I. yE[x] In the case of1B and JN, this is a norm because a;;. ~i. For the same reason, the forgetful functor u : lE + Sets preserves this colimi t. The theorem follows from the connnutation in Sets and proposition 4.

The natural numbers. Let p e SIN - IN and let X be the Top subspace of ~N with underlying set IN v {p}. Then X, being topological, is necessarily grilldetermined, but X does not lie in CH(Cont). In fact, the CH(Cont) coreflection of X is discrete. The proof is simple if one observes that any uniformly continuous map f:Y + X of a contigual merotopic space Y into X has finite range fY. 5 cannot be omitted. 9. Problem. Find an internal characterization of Top("\ CH(Cont) and of Near("I CH(Cont). Qt' the rationals with the usual topology, does not lie in Top nCH(Cont).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.16 of 5 – based on 40 votes